
Unlocking test-optional admissions: What you need to know





David Blobaum is the co-founder and co-owner of Summit Prep, a New Jersey-based test preparation and academic counseling firm. A nationally recognized voice on standardized testing and college admissions, he has dedicated his career to helping students perform at their best. Beyond test results, David is passionate about supporting students’ long-term success by fostering the skills and mindset needed to thrive both academically and in life. In addition to leading Summit Prep, he serves as Director of Outreach on the Board of Directors of the National Test Prep Association, where he regularly educates families about testing and admissions.
Table of contents
- How test-optional policies affect college rankings (and whether you should submit scores)
- Key takeaways
- The changing college admissions landscape
- What test-optional really means
- Smart strategies for score submission
- How rankings and data shape admissions policy
- Testing policies at elite colleges and minority-serving institutions
- Alternatives to test scores and common pitfalls
- Test-optional admissions: What matters most
How test-optional policies affect college rankings (and whether you should submit scores)
If you’re applying to college today, you’ve likely encountered a confusing question: If a school is test-optional, should I still submit my SAT, ACT, or CLT scores? While many colleges no longer require standardized tests, that doesn’t mean test scores no longer matter. Behind the scenes, admissions policies, college rankings, and institutional goals all influence how scores are used.
Understanding what test-optional really means, and how it affects college rankings, can help you make smarter, more strategic decisions during the application process.
Key takeaways
- “Optional” does not mean “irrelevant”: many colleges still consider test scores when they are submitted.
- High test scores are especially valuable for students from high schools that admissions offices may not be familiar with.
- Some colleges shape testing policies partly to improve rankings, not solely for educational or equity reasons.
- Elite colleges may quietly expect strong scores, while minority-serving institutions often use test results as one of several context-driven tools.
- Test-optional admissions increase the importance of grades, coursework rigor, essays, and extracurricular achievements.
The changing college admissions landscape
For decades, standardized tests such as the SAT and ACT have played a central role in U.S. college admissions. That changed rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, when many colleges suspended testing requirements due to canceled exams and limited access to testing facilities. Since then, debates about fairness, equity, and predictive value have pushed test-optional policies into the mainstream.
Today, students and families face more nuanced choices. Each college sets its own testing guidelines, and those policies vary widely. Some schools are fully test-blind, others are test-optional, and still others are test-flexible. Understanding how your test scores fit into this evolving system can have a meaningful impact on your admissions outcomes.
What test-optional really means
At first glance, test-optional admissions seem straightforward: you can choose whether or not to submit SAT or ACT scores. Colleges often frame these policies as a means to expand access, particularly for students who lacked test preparation resources or faced barriers to testing.
In practice, however, test-optional does not mean test-ignored. At many selective colleges, a large share of admitted students still submit scores. Some universities report that more than half of their incoming class includes test results, even though submission is not required. This leads many applicants to wonder whether “optional” quietly means “expected.”
When students choose not to submit scores, admissions officers place greater emphasis on other parts of the application, including:
- High school GPA and grading trends
- Course rigor (honors, AP, IB, or dual enrollment)
- Extracurricular involvement and leadership
- Letters of recommendation
- Personal essays
While this shift can benefit some students, access to advanced courses and extracurricular opportunities is still uneven. Test-optional policies alone do not eliminate disparities in the admissions process.
Because policies differ by institution, and sometimes by program or scholarship, families should carefully review each college’s specific testing guidelines.
Smart strategies for score submission
Deciding whether to submit test scores requires context, especially for students attending high schools that colleges may not recognize well.
If you attend a lesser-known high school, strong SAT or ACT scores can provide valuable external validation. Scores that fall above a college’s middle 50% range signal academic readiness and can reassure admissions officers when the school context is unclear.
On the other hand, submitting scores below a college’s typical range can weaken your application. For example, if a college’s middle 50% SAT range is 1350–1500, submitting a 1250 may hurt more than help, unless other parts of your application are truly exceptional.
Access to test prep also matters. If you faced limited preparation opportunities or had test-day challenges, admissions offices will expect to see other compelling evidence of your academic potential. Still, when available, a strong standardized test score remains a powerful and objective data point.
Bottom line: Submit scores only if they strengthen your application, and always compare your results to the college’s published score ranges before deciding.
How rankings and data shape admissions policy
College rankings, particularly those published by U.S. News & World Report and Times Higher Education, play a significant role in shaping admissions policies. Rankings rely on self-reported data, including admitted students’ test scores, selectivity, and academic profiles.
Some colleges adopt test-optional policies strategically. By encouraging only students with high scores to submit their results, institutions can artificially inflate their reported averages. Test-optional policies may also increase application volume, which can lower acceptance rates and boost perceived selectivity.
When ranking organizations change their methodologies, colleges often adjust their admissions practices in response. For families, this makes it essential to look beyond rankings alone.
One of the most reliable tools is a college’s Common Data Set (CDS). The CDS provides transparent information about test score distributions, acceptance rates, and how various factors are weighted in admissions decisions. Reviewing this data helps applicants understand what colleges truly value, rather than relying solely on marketing language or rankings.
Testing policies at elite colleges and minority-serving institutions
Testing expectations vary widely across institutions. At elite colleges, such as Ivy League schools and similar institutions, high test scores have historically been the norm. Even under test-optional policies, guidance counselors often note that submitting strong scores remains common, especially for students from well-resourced high schools.
Students from affluent backgrounds typically have greater access to tutoring and multiple test attempts, which means disparities persist despite policy changes.
Minority-serving institutions (MSIs), including Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs), often use test scores differently. Rather than acting as strict gatekeepers, test results may serve as one data point among many to assess readiness and determine appropriate academic support. Many MSIs offer flexible pathways designed to balance access, equity, and student success.
Across all institution types, context matters most. Elite colleges may still expect top scores, while MSIs often use them as tools, not barriers, within a broader evaluation framework.
Alternatives to test scores and common pitfalls
When test scores are absent, admissions offices scrutinize the rest of the application more closely. Transcripts, course rigor, recommendations, essays, and extracurricular achievements all take on increased importance.
A common misconception is that test-optional admissions lower standards. In reality, the bar often remains just as high; only the evidence changes. Successful applicants typically demonstrate readiness through challenging coursework, sustained engagement, and strong academic endorsements.
Personal statements also play a larger role. Admissions officers look for authentic alignment between a student’s interests and a college’s mission. Generic applications are less effective than those tailored to each institution.
Students may also benefit from supplemental materials, such as additional recommendations or third-party evaluations, when appropriate. Guidance from counselors familiar with target colleges can be especially valuable.
Choosing not to submit test scores doesn’t simplify admissions, though it changes how you’re evaluated. Thoughtful presentation of your strengths is essential.
Test-optional admissions: What matters most
Test-optional policies have reshaped college admissions, but standardized test scores continue to carry significant weight. Strong scores are particularly helpful for students from less familiar high schools or those who want to reinforce their academic profile. Submitting weaker scores, especially to highly selective colleges, can work against you.
The most effective strategy is data-driven and individualized. Review each college’s Common Data Set, compare your scores to published ranges, and consider your broader academic context. As colleges continue to adjust their policies, staying informed and strategic has never been more important.
Test-optional admissions are not about doing less: they’re about making smarter choices. Students who understand how these policies work and present their strengths with intention and clarity are best positioned to succeed.

